LASIK vs. PRK: Understanding the Key Differences

For individuals wanting to shed the constraints of eyeglasses or contact lenses, refractive surgery presents a transformative opportunity. LASIK (Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis) and PRK (Photorefractive Keratectomy) are two prominent procedures that reshape the cornea, the eye’s outermost layer, to attain clearer vision. But with both vying for your consideration, selecting the optimal solution can be perplexing. We will distinguish the differences between LASIK vs PRK, providing clarity and insight.

LASIK: A Minimally Invasive Approach

The LASIK Procedure

LASIK boasts an ingenious two-step approach. First, a femtosecond laser creates a precise thin, circular flap in the cornea’s outermost layer (epithelium). This flap is gently folded back, exposing the underlying corneal stroma.  Next, the excimer laser meticulously ablates (removes) targeted amounts of corneal tissue, reshaping it to rectify refractive errors like myopia (nearsightedness), hyperopia (farsightedness), and astigmatism. The corneal flap is then gently repositioned and naturally adheres without sutures, accelerating the healing process.

Advantages of LASIK Surgery

1. Quick Recovery

Many patients experience a significant improvement in vision within 24 hours, with optimal results manifesting over a few days.

2. Predictable Outcomes

LASIK delivers precise results, with the majority of patients achieving their desired vision correction.

3. Enhanced Comfort

The creation of a corneal flap preserves the surface epithelium, leading to reduced post-operative discomfort.

4. Minimal Maintenance

Following LASIK, most patients enjoy long-term vision stability, minimizing the need for additional procedures.

Advantages of LASIK explained

LASIK Candidacy and Considerations

LASIK surgery is well-suited for individuals with moderate to severe refractive errors who desire rapid visual recovery. Candidates should meet certain criteria, including stable vision prescription, adequate corneal thickness, and absence of certain eye conditions such as keratoconus. While LASIK has revolutionized vision correction, it is not suitable for everyone. Individuals with thin corneas, severe dry eye conditions, or specific corneal irregularities may not be ideal candidates. Additionally, certain professions or activities that involve a high risk of eye injury may preclude the use of LASIK due to the potential for flap dislodgement.

PRK: The Resilient Alternative

The PRK Procedure

PRK adopts a more straightforward approach. The epithelium, the cornea’s outermost layer, is meticulously removed using an excimer laser or mechanical means. Similar to LASIK, the excimer laser meticulously ablates corneal tissue to rectify refractive errors. However, unlike LASIK, PRK doesn’t involve creating a corneal flap. Instead, a natural bandage (epithelial layer) regenerates over the treated area within a few days.

Advantages of PRK Surgery

PRK advantages explained
1. Corneal Preservation

PRK eliminates the risk of flap-related complications, making it a preferred choice for patients with thinner corneas or occupations that pose a higher risk of eye trauma.

2. Suitability for Thin Corneas

Since PRK does not require the creation of a corneal flap, it is often recommended for individuals with thinner corneas who may not be suitable candidates for LASIK.

3. Reduced Risk of Dry Eye

By avoiding the creation of a corneal flap, PRK reduces the risk of post-operative dry eye symptoms.

Candidate Suitability for PRK

PRK is often favored for individuals with thin corneas, certain corneal irregularities, or professions that pose a higher risk of eye trauma. The absence of a corneal flap eliminates the potential for flap-related complications, making PRK a suitable option for those who may not be ideal candidates for LASIK. Candidates should have realistic expectations regarding the recovery process, as visual recovery may be slower compared to LASIK.

Schedule a FREE LASIK Consultation Today

book now

Unveiling the Key Distinctions: LASIK vs. PRK

While both LASIK and PRK culminate in improved vision, they diverge in their approaches and suitability for certain individuals. Here’s a closer overview of their core distinctions:


Candidate Selection: Who is Ideal for LASIK or PRK?

The suitability for LASIK or PRK hinges on several factors, including corneal thickness, the nature and severity of your refractive error, and your tolerance for discomfort. Here’s a glimpse into ideal candidates for each procedure:

LASIK: Well-suited for individuals with adequate corneal thickness and who prioritize a swifter recovery.

PRK: Ideal for those with corneas that are too thin for LASIK or individuals engaged in occupations or activities that could dislodge a LASIK flap (e. g., frequent contact sports).

The Ultimate Verdict: LASIK vs PRK?

Both LASIK and PRK surgeries offer effective solutions for correcting refractive errors and achieving clearer vision. While LASIK boasts rapid visual recovery and predictability, PRK provides a safer alternative for individuals with thinner corneas or occupations that predispose them to eye trauma. Ultimately, the optimal selection between LASIK and PRK hinges on a consultation with a qualified ophthalmologist. They will assess your corneal anatomy, refractive error, and overall eye health to determine the most suitable procedure for your unique needs and preferences. Don’t hesitate to voice any concerns or questions you may have throughout the consultation process.

By understanding the nuances of these procedures, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your unique needs and consulting with your ophthalmologist regarding their vision correction journey. Like any surgery, LASIK has risks and potential complications that are discussed during a surgical consultation prior to the procedure.  If you have any further questions, please consult with your eye doctor.


LASIK — Laser Eye Surgery. (2023, December 11). American Academy of Ophthalmology.

What Is Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)? (2023, October 20). American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Seeing Life Clearly: A Guide to Vision Correction Options (Updated November 2023)

Glasses, contacts, surgery? With so many options for correcting vision these days, how do you determine what is best for your eyes and lifestyle? In this overview, we break down the pros and cons of today’s vision correction methods—from old standbys like eyeglasses to cutting-edge surgical procedures—to help you make a clear-eyed decision.

Non-Surgical Vision Correction:



  • Non-Invasive: Eyeglasses offer a non-invasive and easily reversible method of vision correction.
  • Versatility: Suitable for correcting various refractive errors, including myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia.
  • Fashion Accessory: Eyeglasses have evolved into a fashion statement, enabling individuals to express their style through a wide range of frames.


  • Peripheral Distortion: Some individuals may experience peripheral distortion or reflections, affecting the clarity of vision. Lenses may also fog when transitioning between different temperatures.
  • Limited Peripheral Vision: Frames can limit peripheral vision, which may be a concern in certain activities.
  • Weight and Discomfort: Wearing glasses can become uncomfortable due to their weight and pressure on the bridge of the nose.

Contact Lenses—Convenient But Require Care 


  • Natural Appearance: Contact lenses provide a more natural appearance without the visible presence of eyeglasses.
  • Unrestricted Field of View: Unlike glasses, contact lenses don’t obstruct peripheral vision.
  • Suitable for Active Lifestyles: Ideal for individuals with active lifestyles or those who find glasses inconvenient.   


  • Maintenance Required: Regular cleaning and proper hygiene practices are necessary to prevent eye infections.
  • Dry Eye Disease: Some individuals may experience dry eyes as a result of wearing contact lenses.     
  • Risk of Infections: Incorrect use or poor hygiene can lead to serious eye infections.
  • Environmental Concerns: The disposal of contact lenses and their packaging contributes to environmental waste.

Refractive Surgery:

Modern LASIK (Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis) Custom Bladeless—Most Popular Surgery


  • Rapid Results: LASIK often provides rapid visual recovery, with many patients experiencing improved vision within the first several hours to a day.
  • Long-Lasting: The effects of LASIK are typically long-lasting, reducing or eliminating the need for glasses.


  • Surgical Risks: As with any surgery, LASIK carries some risks, including infection, dry eyes, and changes in vision.  
  • Cost: LASIK can be a significant financial investment compared to non-surgical methods.

PRK (Photorefractive Keratectomy):


  • No Flap Creation: PRK doesn’t involve creating a corneal flap, reducing the risk of flap-related complications.
  • Suitable for Thin Corneas: PRK may be a better option for individuals with thinner corneas.


  • Extended Recovery Time: PRK typically has a longer recovery period compared to LASIK.
  • Discomfort During Healing: Some discomfort and light sensitivity may be experienced during the initial healing phase.

SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction):


  • No Flap Creation: SMILE involves a small incision rather than a corneal flap, potentially reducing complications.
  • Potential Preservation of Corneal Strength: Early studies indicate that the SMILE procedure preserves more corneal tissue, benefiting the structural integrity of the cornea.


  • Limited Availability: SMILE may not be as widely available as LASIK or PRK.
  • Similar complications to LASIK: In studies, complications can be similar to LASIK, including infection, dry eyes, and changes in vision.
  • Cost: The SMILE procedure can cost significantly more than LASIK or PRK.

EVO ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens):


  • Reversible Procedure: EVO ICL is an implantable lens that can be removed if necessary, making the procedure reversible.
  • High Refractive Correction: EVO ICL is suitable for individuals with high degrees of myopia or hyperopia.


  • Invasive Procedure: EVO ICL involves a surgical procedure to implant the lens in the eye.
  • Potential for Complications: As with any surgical procedure, there is a risk of complications, including infection or changes in intraocular pressure, endothelial cell loss, and corneal decompensation.

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K):


  • Non-Surgical: Ortho-K involves the use of specially designed contact lenses to reshape the cornea overnight without surgery.
  • Daytime Freedom: Individuals can enjoy better vision during the day without the need for glasses or lenses.


  • Temporary Effects: The effects of Ortho-K are temporary, and consistent lens wear is required for sustained results.
  • Risk of Infection: Proper hygiene practices are crucial to prevent eye infections associated with contact lens use.
  • Vision Instability: Vision may change throughout the day depending on the frequency of use.
  • Comfort: It may be challenging to sleep with a rigid contact lens on the eye.

The vision correction arena offers more excellent options than ever. But determining what works best is a personal decision based on your eyes, budget, and lifestyle. With an understanding of today’s methods, you can zero in on the choice that allows you to see life most clearly. Choosing the most suitable method involves careful consideration of the pros and cons associated with each approach, along with consultation with a qualified eye care professional. Whether opting for the convenience of eyeglasses, the flexibility of contact lenses, or the transformative effects of refractive surgery, individuals can make informed decisions to achieve optimal visual clarity and comfort.